May 15 2008

Some Thoughts on Direct Action

Posted by: Danielle| Category: News | 0 Comments

“You may well ask: “Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn’t negotiation a better path?” You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

 

Groups who practice direct action begin their campaign making an effort to meet with the person who has the power to make change happen. Phone calls, emails, and invitations often go ignored for significant periods of time. Think about the last time you just couldn’t get someone to listen to you about something that was important to you. Did you feel valued? Empowered? Appreciated? Of course you didn’t!

 

When elected officals disregard the will of the people they have been commissioned to serve by refusing to meet with community groups or when school officials refuse to meet with students, there is a sense that the people are powerless and have no real say in the decisions that affect their lives. When large numbers of people are repeatedly ignored, direct action is the only option to ensure that their democratic voice is heard.

 

It is in the framework of democracy to work tirelessly to improve existing systems to ensure equality and justice for all. But how can equality and justice be pursued if mass amounts of people aren’t able to communicate with those in power? As Dr. King relays, direct action is a means to get to the negotiating table with those in power. All great movements for civil rights have used direct action. Many of today’s labor laws today were fought for using direct action. Countless numbers of victories for social justice were won by utilizing direct action. Though it is not the only tactic, it has been and will continue to be an effective one. Direct action is never exercised out of spite, but simply as a way to get results & to demand collective voices be heard.

 

“We who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

 

Feb 15 2008

National School Board Association Recognizes HSYD’s work

Posted by: editor| Category: News | 0 Comments

Hope Street Youth Development and Students United members and allied groups (including East High School’s Gay-Straight Alliance) congratulate the School Board for including sexual orientation in its Anti-bullying Plan, but they continue to dialogue with the district to make schools safe and fair for all students by amending its anti-discrimination policy to include sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation.  Student efforts have made quite an impact and have even been recognized by the National School Board Association who cited their advocacy work in an article published in the School Board News. See the article at http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_sbn_issue.asp?TRACKID=&VID=55&CID=682&DID=42103

Feb 06 2008

Students Outraged at lack of support from Superintendent and Chief

Posted by: editor| Category: News | 0 Comments

Students from Hope Street and Students United hosted a community wide public meeting at St. Pauls United Methodist. Although neither Chief Norman Williams nor Winston Brooks attended or sent representatives, there was overwhelming support of the students and their message. Currently the students are trying to set up meetings with both Chief Norman Williams and Superintendent Winston Brooks to discuss the need for assemblies in each of the 8 high schools.
At this point the Chief has refused to meet with the students even after several written requests and a visit to his office. When the students went to his office to request a meeting he said he would not meet with them. He has reversed the recomendations of both Deputy Chief Tom Stoltz and Deputy Chief Lee who both were in favor of the assemblies which the students are requesting.
Superintendent Brooks, speaking through his Assistant Superintendent Denise Wren at a meeting prior to the public meeting said this issue does not affect enough students to warrant a 30 minute assembly in the high schools. Ms. Wren said. “We can argue about this all day, but we are not going to do assemblies in the high schools”.
There is much work to be done on this issue and we appreciate your support.

«older posts newer posts»

© 2006 SmashApathy.org | Wordpress | dKret 1.9 | Top